Who Was Krishna?

80

By jainismus

Who Was Krishna?

Krishna is the main character of Mahabharat, the famous and popular epic of India. It is considered as a holy Hindu book, but it is a collection of several fables. It has nothing to do with any specific religion. Further, Mahabharat was compiled after Vardhaman Mahaveer and Gautam Buddha.

Vedics were in search of an ancient Kshatriya (Warrior Class) personality popular in masses to use for safeguarding their interests. They choose Krishna, declared him a God, and spread Geeta from his mouth. They wanted a Kshatriya personality because the Shramanic religions promoted by Vardhaman Mahaveer and Gautam Buddha were popular in warrior class.

Geeta itself was written in reign of Gupts, who were supporters of Vedic religion. Geeta is a separate text, and it is not a part of Mahabharat. As Vedics have a fondness of violence from the beginning, the Geeta is nothing but a book promoting war against own people.

There is no doubt that Krishna was a non-vedic person, belonging to Yadavs, who were enemies for the Vedics. If you take a deep look of Krishna's life, you will find that Krishna was a black, as the Yadavs were, and he defeated Vedic Gods like Indra and Varun.

Then what was the religious tradition of Krishna?

About Yadu People

Before throwing light on the religious tradition of Krishna, let us know about the Yadav people. I have mentioned above that Yadavs were non-Vedics, and the Vedics always described them as enemies.

According to advocate P.R. Deshmukh, one of the great scholars of Indology and Indus Valley Civilization, writes:

According to Vedic literature, Yadus were one of the Panch Jan (five group of people), and were not eligible to become a King. Most of the Yadus were follower of Jainism. Vasudev, the father of Krishna was mostly a Jain. ..... It is not just a co-incidence that Where ever there were strong holds of Yadus, there we find some of the oldest remains of Jains.*

Further he writes, Worshiping Krishna by Vedic Hindus is a later thing, and it is influenced by Jainism. This worship prohibits use of meat and alcohol by the devotees.

* Examples: Mathura, Shauripur, Hastinapur etc.

Krishna in Jainism

As I have described above that Krishna was not a Vedic personality, so the only religious tradition of him could be Shramanic. Jainism and Buddhism were two Shramanic religions in ancient India. As Buddhism was founded by Gautam Buddha in 6th Century B.C.E, and the estimated time period of Krishna is 10th century B.C.E., there is no question of Krishna being from Buddhist tradition. Further, there are no references to Krishna in Buddhist literature.

On the contrary, Jainism is much older than Buddhism, and even than Vedic religion as we can trace the roots of Jainism in Indus Valley civilization.

Krishna enjoys a special position in Jainism. He is the elder cousin of Aritthanemi, the 22nd ford maker of Jainism. He is a half Chakravarti (Semi Emperor), and one of the 63 great personalities of Jain literature. Further, according to Jainism, he will be a ford maker (Teerthankar) in next cycle of Teerthankars.

Interestingly, not only Krishna, but his father Vasudev, brother Balaram and cousin Arritthnemi also are in the Jain list of 63 great personalities. Further, a Jain book Vasudevhindi is fully dedicated to Vasudev, father of Krishna.

According to modern research, sage Ghor Angiras was spiritual teacher of Krishna, and he was no one else but Arritthanemi.

References to Krishna in Jain literature go back to ancient period. Antagadadasao, an aagamic text of Jainism first gives detailed biography of Krishna. Further, his biography is given in Trishasti Shalaka Purush, a popular text of Jainism.

All these facts prove that Krishna was from ancient Jain tradition.

-Mahavir Sanglikar

References:

1. Indus Civilization, Rigved and Hindu Culture by P.R. Deshmukh
2. Trishasti Shalaka Purush (Jain Agamic Text)
3. Hindu Dharmache Shaiv Rahasya: Sanjay Sonawani

Comments

puneet jain 6 months ago

aapse ek request hai...aap jo bhi likhte hain..plz in baaton ka prooof diya kijiye ki in baaton ka historical proof diya kiiye..jaise ki "geeta baad mein bani hai..shri mahaveer swaami bhagwan ke baad mein bani hai..toh aap is baat ko kis adhaar par keh rahe hain...aapne yeh post bahut achchi likhi hai..historical mean according to indian historians..and latest researchs..

Major Ajit Raka 6 months ago

This one is good article only if you could give the complete references. The statement "Vedics were in search of an ancient Kshatriya (Warrior Class) personality popular in masses to use for safeguarding their interests. They choose Krishna, declared him a God, and spread Geeta from his mouth." is true then Aritthnemi [Neminath], who was cousin of Krishna, what was he? Probably the statement needs revision. Do you mean to say that the character Krishna was not there? Since it is said 'Mahabharat was recited by Vyas and written by Ganesh.

jainismus profile image

jainismus Hub Author 6 months ago

I am writing the history of writing of Mahabharat and Geeta separately. Krishna existed, and so Arritthanemii to, but Krishna was not under Vedic fold untill 3rd Century C.E. Great scholars like D.D. Kosambi, Bhandarkar and others have proved it. Please wait for my next article with referances on this subject.

Akshay Kittur profile image

Akshay Kittur 6 months ago

Nobody will keep a record of their wrong intentions nor they will pass it to their next generations. It can be known only by logical reasoning based on events occurred in history. So there cannot be a proof of vedics searching for heroes. It has to be assumed.

Dwarkadhish 4 weeks ago

Krishana was super human and letter he became Most Power full Divine Power

Sri Balananda 2 weeks ago

Please give a list of all 63 sakala purushas of jainism.

jainismus profile image

jainismus Hub Author 2 weeks ago

Sure. I will write a separate article on this subject.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working